EdStat: A Study of 639 Charter School Applications in Four States Found That Applications That Included Plans to Hire a Management Organization Were 10 Percentage Points More Likely to Be Approved

By 04/18/2018

Print | NO PDF

Standalone or single-site charter schools are essential to achieving a responsive mix of school options for families. Increasingly, however, single-site schools appear to suffer a higher burden of proof to justify their existence, relative to CMOs, and there might be “preferences” baked into the charter-authorizing process that keep standalone charter schools from getting approved. A recent Fordham report found that only 21 percent of applicants who did not plan to hire a CMO or an EMO to run their school had their charters approved, compared to 31 percent of applicants who did have such plans. This finding could very well indicate a bias toward CMO or EMO applicants over those who wish to start standalone schools. Read “Strengthening the Roots of the Charter-School Movement” by Derrell Bradford, which will appear in our Summer 2018 issue, to learn more about the challenges that single-site charter schools face—and how their independent operators might overcome them.

—Education Next

Sponsored Results
Sponsored by

Harvard Kennedy School Program on Educational Policy and Governance

Sponsored by

Notify Me When Education Next Posts a Big Story