Is Test-Based Accountability Dead?

Three experts weigh in, and look to the future

Since the 2001 passage of the No Child Left Behind Act, test-based accountability has been an organizing principle—perhaps the organizing principle—of efforts to improve American schools. But lately, accountability has been under fire from many critics, including Common Core opponents and those calling for more multifaceted measures of teacher and school performance. And yet the Every Student Succeeds Act, NCLB’s successor law, still mandates standardized testing of students and requires states to have accountability systems. So: is accountability on the wane, or is it here to stay? If accountability is indeed dying, would its loss be good or bad for students?

In this issue’s forum, we present three different viewpoints on those questions from Morgan S. Polikoff, associate professor of education at the University of Southern California’s Rossier School of Education; Jay P. Greene, professor of education at the University of Arkansas; and Kevin Huffman, former Tennessee commissioner of education.



Why Accountability Matters, and Why It Must Evolve
by Morgan S. Polikoff





Futile Accountability Systems Should Be Abandoned
by Jay P. Greene





If Parents Push for It, Accountability Can Work
by Kevin Huffman



This article appeared in the Summer 2017 issue of Education Next. Suggested citation format:

Polikoff, M.S., Greene, J.P., Huffman, K. (2017). Is Test-Based Accountability Dead? Education Next talks with Morgan S. Polikoff, Jay P. Greene, and Kevin Huffman. Education Next, 17(3), 50-58.

Last Updated


Notify Me When Education Next

Posts a Big Story

Business + Editorial Office

Program on Education Policy and Governance
Harvard Kennedy School
79 JFK Street, Cambridge, MA 02138
Phone (617) 496-5488
Fax (617) 496-4428

For subscription service to the printed journal
Phone (617) 496-5488

Copyright © 2024 President & Fellows of Harvard College