Rethinking the Rules on Federal Higher-Ed Spending
How can Congress spur innovation while clamping down on fraud?
By Michael B. Horn, Alana Dunagan and Kevin Carey
With the cost of college soaring and the national six-year completion rate below 60 percent, the federal government’s support for higher education is facing heightened scrutiny. What kind of regulation and accountability should Congress impose on what might be termed the world’s largest voucher program—Washington’s hefty funding of Pell grants and subsidized loans? As legislators turn their attention to revising the Higher Education Act, are current levels of regulation sufficient and appropriate, or is there perhaps too much paperwork, bureaucracy, and compliance? What can be learned from the Obama administration’s efforts to hold underperforming programs to account?
In this forum we hear from Michael B. Horn, co-founder of the Clayton Christensen Institute and an executive editor of Education Next, with Alana Dunagan, a research fellow at the Christensen Institute, and from Kevin Carey, vice president for education policy and knowledge management at New America.
Change the Rules to Unleash Innovation
By Michael B. Horn and Alana Dunagan
Strong Hand of Regulation Protects Students
By Kevin Carey
Related EdNext Articles
- Change the Rules to Unleash Innovation
- Strong Hand of Regulation Protects Students
- EdStat: Every Year, the Federal Government Spends More than $100 Billion on Higher Education, Mainly in the Form of Grants and Subsidized Loans to Students
- EdStat: A New Version of the HEA Would Cut the “90/10” Rule, which Requires Colleges to Raise a Minimum of 10 Percent of their Revenues from Sources Other than Federal Financial Aid
education next daily email alert
education next posts a big story